Showing questions for August 08, 2025
- Total: 23 questions
Question 6 Aug 08, 2025
▼
Prime Minister Narendra Modi highlighted the legacy of which scientist while discussing India's agricultural future and nutritional security?
MS SwaminathanPrime Minister Modi paid tribute to MS Swaminathan, the architect of India's Green Revolution, during his speech on agricultural development. He emphasized Swaminathan's early focus on forgotten crops like millets and his warnings about excessive chemical use in farming. Modi credited Swaminathan with foreseeing today’s challenges related to climate change and nutrition. The PM also recalled Swaminathan's proposal to transfer mangrove genetics into rice for climate resilience and introduced the concept of the Evergreen Revolution for sustainable agriculture. A commemorative coin and stamp were released in his honor during the event.
Question 7 Aug 08, 2025
▼
What major trade action did the US take against India, prompting strong reactions from Indian officials and global observers?
Imposed a 50 percent tariff on Indian goodsThe United States, under President Donald Trump, increased tariffs on Indian goods to 50 percent, citing India's continued import of Russian oil as the reason. This move was seen as an attempt to pressure India into reducing its energy dependence on Russia and opening its agricultural and dairy markets to US products. Indian officials called the decision 'unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable,' noting that negotiations were progressing before the abrupt hike. The new tariffs, effective August 28, 2025, are among the highest imposed on any US trading partner. Experts suggest India may pivot to alternative markets in the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America to mitigate the impact.
Question 8 Aug 08, 2025
▼
What key agricultural reforms and technologies did PM Modi emphasize for India's future farming resilience?
Development of climate-resilient crops and AI integration in agriculturePM Modi outlined a vision for Indian agriculture focused on nutritional security, crop diversification, and climate-resilient technologies. He advocated for drought-tolerant, heat-resistant, and flood-adaptive crop varieties, and emphasized integrating AI and machine learning into farming systems. Real-time decision support systems for yield forecasting, pest monitoring, and farming guidance were recommended for every district. He also promoted solar-powered micro-irrigation, drip systems, precision irrigation, and affordable soil testing tools. These initiatives align with MS Swaminathan’s vision of sustainable and environmentally balanced farming.
Question 9 Aug 08, 2025
▼
What was the Delhi Government's key reform in land registration to reduce bureaucratic delays?
Elimination of the requirement for Revenue Department NOCs in most casesThe Delhi Government, led by Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, simplified land deals by eliminating the need for No-Objection Certificates (NOCs) from the Revenue Department in most cases. This reform aims to reduce long queues and procedural delays for citizens. Sub-registrars will now register documents strictly under the Indian Registration Act, 1908, based on legally valid grounds. A 'Buyer Beware' clause places responsibility on buyers to verify land status, while GIS technology and an integrated Patwari network will enhance monitoring. Protected categories like Gram Sabha and forest lands remain safeguarded against fraudulent transactions.
Question 10 Aug 08, 2025
▼
What did the Supreme Court rule regarding Justice Varma's plea challenging the in-house misconduct inquiry?
The court upheld the in-house committee's procedure and found no constitutional violationThe Supreme Court dismissed Justice Varma's plea, affirming that the in-house committee and the then Chief Justice of India followed proper procedure in the misconduct inquiry. While the court noted that uploading video footage of the fire incident wasn’t mandatory, it held that this omission didn’t affect the outcome. The bench emphasized that the in-house mechanism has legal sanctity and is not outside the constitutional framework. It found no violation of Justice Varma’s fundamental rights and granted him liberty to raise concerns during any future impeachment. The inquiry had concluded that Justice Varma and his family had control over a storeroom where burnt cash was found, warranting serious misconduct.